« No Charges Against Olly Barkley | Main | South Africa 26 New Zealand 45 »
Tuqiri Spear Overshadows New Zealand Triumph
As Scrumbag went un-updated on Monday, we completely failed to report on the Tri-Nations game at the weekend. Apologies for that, here's a catch-up for those who were missing it.
New Zealand have retained their Tri-Nations crown after coming from behind to beat Australia in Auckland. The All Blacks, who trailed 20-11 at half-time, have thus wrapped up the title with two games in hand, to be played in South Africa over the next two weekends. Normally the best time to beat a seemingly unbeatable side, but somehow I don't think their current unbeaten run is something the ABs will give up cheaply. Beneath the cut we deal with the real story of the game.
The game will be remembered more, though, for a spear tackle by Australia's Lote Tuqiri on Richie McCaw. McCaw, who has been the player of the tournament so far in many people's eyes, seemed to be targetted for this treatment in order to nullify his influence on the game. Tuqiri has since copped a five-match ban for the offence, of which only one game will be an international. The ban seems unduly light for an offence which can end a player's career. Flankers Rocky Elsom and Phil Waugh were also guilty of offences against McCaw, and given the player's recent form, it is unedifying to see such a cynical approach.
We here at Scrumbag have in the past (and, let's face it, present) been quick to lay into Tana Umaga for his similar, unpunished spear tackle on Lions captain Brian O'Driscoll last summer, and the New Zealand camp for their seeming insistence that nothing happened. Regardless of who is performing the spear tackle, and who is being tackled, it is something that needs to be removed from the game. Along with the equally sickening practice of pulling down a jumper at the line-out, the spear tackle is an offence which can have hideous consequences, the more so for the fact that a player's downward journey is not controlled.
Both O'Driscoll and McCaw were able to comment on their experiences, but one wonders when a player of such profile might not be so lucky, given that this kind of tackle can leave a player paralysed or worse. One wonders also whether this is what it might take to see the offence dealt with in the appropriate manner. Hopefully not. As rugby fans, we love the game for what it is. Tough, bruising battles, even a little bit of blood in the right circumstances, give the game its edge. Spear tackles, and worse, taking players out in the air, go against the spirit of the battle. They are cowardly offences performed on unsuspecting sportsmen, and it is important that they are condemned from all sides.
Tuqiri's punishment is a joke. As long as players feel they can get away with spear tackling, receiving at most a slap on the wrist, there will be players who are tempted to do it. Neil Back was banned for six months for pushing a ref. Inexcusable offence, but the ref was always going to stand up and walk away from it. A punishment of similar severity, or longer, is needed for the clowns who drive or throw an opponent head-first towards the ground. No excuse about the heat of the moment can mitigate the dangers of spear tackling. And for all the excuses that might get offered up, it will happen less if moves are made to make it punishable by the harshest sanctions available. Hopefully Tuqiri will take his time off to appreciate that he's being given a chance, and take that chance to never make another such tackle.
August 25, 2006 in Tri Nations | Permalink
Comments
Hello, it is me again.
Please name the second person in the BOD 'tackle' - the person more responsible for the 'spear' than Tana.
Cheers
Posted by: Christopher Wilson | 25 Aug 2006 06:12:15
Yes, that was Keven Mealamu. Umaga was the one who sat before the world's press denying anything untoward had occurred. Justin Marshall was the one player who showed any hint of concern for a fellow professional - something that, as captain, Umaga should have taken it upon himself to do.
Umaga was also the one who, on the Grand Slam tour, sat out one game, and one game only. The Ireland one. What was he, or Graham Henry, worried about? Yes, he'd have got dog's abuse from the Lansdowne Road faithful. Rightly so, in my view. But surely he could take it?
Posted by: Paul | 25 Aug 2006 08:40:35
You miss the point, it's one rule for kiwis and another for the rest of the rugby playing world. Once you understand that, all becomes clear!!! After all, they invented the game. Didn't they??
Posted by: Gareth | 25 Aug 2006 20:24:49
uh the english invented the game.
Posted by: dan | 26 Aug 2006 04:52:41
I totally agree with the article but lets face it, Tana and masoi went unpunished, Collins went unpunished for his hair pulling. All three of them were all backs. If the same offences are done by others they are punished sooner or later. I wonder what would happen if an Aussie player pulled an all blacks hair. that I would like to see.
Posted by: Pacific | 26 Aug 2006 06:05:24
I wouldn't say the offences went unpunished because they were committed by ABs - I don't believe there is any conspiracy. Tuqiri's pathetically short suspension shows that the powers that be simply don't take spear tackling seriously enough. Umaga and Mealamu went unpunished more because there was a shameful reluctance from the match officials (chiefly the touch judge) to report what happened.
Posted by: Paul | 26 Aug 2006 11:46:01
read blogs and submit blogs here.
Posted by: vikas | 13 Nov 2006 12:51:49
The comments to this entry are closed.